Wilson v. Stephens ( 1998 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 97-10247
    Summary Calendar
    LONZIE WILSON, JR.,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    No First Name STEPHENS, Assistant Warden;
    R. EASON, Major,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:96-CV-153-X
    - - - - - - - - - -
    April 2, 1998
    Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Lonzie Wilson, Jr., # 711254, has filed an application for
    leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the
    district court’s dismissal of his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     complaint for
    failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.     
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (e)(2)(B)(ii).   By moving for IFP, Wilson is
    challenging the district court’s certification that IFP should
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 97-10247
    -2-
    not be granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good
    faith.    See Baugh v. Taylor, 
    117 F.3d 197
    , 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
    Wilson has alleged that Stephens and Eason were aware that
    Inmate Jones was mentally disturbed and on medication.     He has
    not specifically alleged that they were aware of facts which
    would have put them on notice that Jones presented a substantial
    risk of serious harm.    See Farmer v. Brennan, 
    511 U.S. 825
    , 837
    (1994).    Accordingly, we uphold the district court’s order
    certifying that the appeal is not taken in good faith.     Wilson’s
    request for IFP status is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as
    frivolous.    See Baugh, 
    117 F.3d at
    202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    We caution Wilson that any additional frivolous appeals
    filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of
    sanctions.    To avoid sanctions, Wilson is further cautioned to
    review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise
    arguments that are frivolous.
    IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-10247

Filed Date: 4/7/1998

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014