United States v. Barron-Iracheta , 84 F. App'x 450 ( 2004 )

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 6, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-41552
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELISA BARRON-IRACHETA,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-02-CR-221-1
Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Elisa Barron-Iracheta (Barron) appeals following her
jury-trial conviction and sentence for possession with intent to
distribute less than 50 kilograms of marijuana and a related
conspiracy count. She contends that the Government improperly
adduced and commented at trial on evidence of her silence and calm
demeanor manifested prior to her being advised of her rights under
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Barron did not object at
trial, and she fails to show that there was any plain or obvious
error that affected her substantial rights with regard to the
evidence or the Government’s comment upon it. See United States v.
Garcia-Flores, 246 F.3d 451, 457 (5th Cir. 2001); see also Fletcher
v. Weir, 455 U.S. 603, 606-07 (1982); United States v. Musquiz, 45
F.3d 927, 930 (5th Cir. 1995).
Barron asserts that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional
in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Barron
concedes that her claim is foreclosed by United States v.
Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580 (5th Cir. 2000). She raises the issue only
to preserve it for Supreme Court review.
Barron’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2