Bank One NA v. Johnson ( 2003 )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
Consolidated Cases Nos. 02-60734, 02-60778,
02-60746, 02-60766, 02-60762, 02-60745,
02-60786, 02-60752, 02-60747, 02-60779,
02-60802
Summary Calendar
_______________________
Case No. 02-60734
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MICHELLE JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60778
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GREGORY LEDELL THOMAS; PRINCELLA THOMAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60746
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
VELMA GREEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60766
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MACK ARTHUR PICKENS, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60762
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
J. C. ROBERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60745
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MARILYN NAILER, A/K/A MARILYN NAILOR;
BARRY NAILER, A/K/A BARRY NAILOR,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60786
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
THOMAS WRIGHT; ANNIE WRIGHT,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60752
BANK ONE NA,
2
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOANN NEWSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60747
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GLORIA JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60779
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LOYD WALTON, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60802
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CLARA BUTLER, A/K/A CLARA BULTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
_____________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
(3:01-CV-39)
_____________________________________________
February 25, 2003
3
Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellants challenge the district court’s rulings
granting Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and to stay the
Appellants’ pending state law claims. This case is
indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in the
related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd1 and Bank One, N.A. v.
Lake.2 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our
opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank One,
N.A. v. Coates,3 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,4 the judgment of the
district court in this case is, in all respects, AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).
2
No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
3
125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001).
4
No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order granting petition to compel
arbitration).
4