United States v. Salinas-Calderon ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 01-10898
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    GERARDO SALINAS-CALDERON,
    also known as Gerardo Calderon Salinas,
    also known as Omar Chacon,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:00-CR-474-1-D
    --------------------
    December 12, 2001
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Gerardo Salinas-Calderon appeals his guilty plea conviction
    of being found in the United States after removal in violation of
    8 U.S.C. § 1326.   He argues that his guilty plea was involuntary.
    Salinas-Calderon contends that the district court failed to
    advise him during the plea colloquy that a prior aggravated
    felony conviction is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C.
    § 1326(b)(2), which the government would have to prove to a jury
    beyond a reasonable doubt.   Salinas-Calderon acknowledges that
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 01-10898
    -2-
    his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in
    Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
    (1998), but
    seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of
    the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
    (2000).
    Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See 
    Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90
    ; United States v. Dabeit, 
    231 F.3d 979
    , 984
    (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
    531 U.S. 1202
    (2001).   Salinas-
    Calderon’s argument is foreclosed.   The judgment of the district
    court is AFFIRMED.
    In lieu of filing an appellee’s brief, the Government has
    filed a motion asking this court to dismiss this appeal or, in
    the alternative, to summarily affirm the district court’s
    judgment.   The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.   The
    motion for a summary affirmance is GRANTED.   The Government need
    not file an appellee’s brief.
    AFFIRMED; MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED; MOTION FOR SUMMARY
    AFFIRMANCE GRANTED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-10898

Filed Date: 12/13/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014