United States v. Olivo , 353 F. App'x 958 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    November 30, 2009
    No. 08-51309
    Summary Calendar               Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    CARLOS ALEJANDRO OLIVO,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeals from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 5:05-CR-191-ALL
    Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Carlos Alejandro Olivo appeals his enhanced sentence following a guilty
    plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C.
    §§ 922(g)(1), 924(e)(1). Olivo argues that the district court plainly erred by
    sentencing him as an armed career criminal because one of the convictions used
    to enhance his sentence, a 1992 Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation, is
    not a violent felony within the meaning of § 924(e)(1). He also argues that
    *
    Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 08-51309
    § 922(g) is unconstitutional under United States v. Lopez, 
    514 U.S. 549
    (1995);
    however, he properly concedes that this issue is foreclosed by this circuit’s
    precedent. See United States v. De Leon, 
    170 F.3d 494
    , 499 (5th Cir. 1999).
    In response to Olivo’s challenge to the propriety of his enhanced sentence,
    the Government has supplemented the record with a written stipulation of
    testimony entered by Olivo in connection with his guilty plea to the 1992
    burglary charge. See Shepard v. United States, 
    544 U.S. 13
    , 16 (2005); United
    States v. Garcia-Arellano, 
    522 F.3d 477
    , 481 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    129 S. Ct. 353
    (2008). Olivo’s stipulation makes it clear that his prior offense was a violent
    felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act. See United States v. Constante,
    
    544 F.3d 584
    , 585-87 (5th Cir. 2008); T EX. P ENAL C ODE A NN. § 30.02(a)(1), (3)
    (Vernon 1989).
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-51309

Citation Numbers: 353 F. App'x 958

Judges: Reavley, Davis, Garza

Filed Date: 11/30/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024