United States v. Hebert ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 99-30899
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JOAN HEBERT,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 95-CR-257-2-F
    --------------------
    June 13, 2000
    Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges
    PER CURIAM:*
    Joan Hebert appeals the sentence imposed for her convictions
    of possession with the intent to distribute cocaine base and
    cocaine powder in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1) and 
    18 U.S.C. § 2
    .    She argues that the district court clearly erred in
    finding that she had occupied a supervisory role in the illicit
    enterprise.
    This court reviews the sentencing court's application of the
    sentencing guidelines de novo and accepts the sentencing court's
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 99-30899
    -2-
    findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.       United
    States v. Rodriguez-Guzman, 
    56 F.3d 18
    , 20 (5th Cir. 1995).
    The sentencing guidelines mandate a two-level increase in
    the defendant’s offense level if the defendant was “an organizer,
    leader, manager, or supervisor in any criminal activity"
    involving fewer than five participants.       See § 3B1.1(c).   To
    qualify for this adjustment, “the defendant must have been the
    organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of one or more other
    participants.”     § 3B1.1, comment. (n.2).   A sentencing court's
    determination that a defendant played a leadership role is a
    factual finding reviewable only for clear error.       See United
    States v. Parker, 
    133 F.3d 322
    , 329 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    523 U.S. 1142
     (1998).     The district court’s findings are not clearly
    erroneous if they are plausible in light of the record viewed in
    its entirety.     See United States v. Kelley, 
    140 F.3d 596
    , 609
    (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    525 U.S. 908
     (1998).
    Viewed as a whole, the record contains sufficient reliable
    evidence to support the district court’s finding that Hebert
    played a supervisory role in the offense.       See United States v.
    Powell, 
    124 F.3d 655
    , 667 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 
    522 U.S. 1130
     (1998).     Accordingly, her sentence is
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-30899

Filed Date: 6/14/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021