Trevino v. Sanders ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    _____________________
    No. 99-40039
    Summary Calendar
    _____________________
    GILBERTO TREVINO,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    TIMOTHY D. SANDERS, RN, Michael Unit;
    ANICETO DOMINGUEZ, Doctor, Coffield Unit;
    JOHN ZOND, Dr., Michael Unit; UNIDENTIFIED
    RIGGLEMAN, X-ray Technician, Michael Unit;
    LOUIS E. GIBSON, Medical Director, Michael
    Unit; GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas
    Department of Criminal Justice,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 6:98-CV-538
    _________________________________________________________________
    November 11, 1999
    Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Gilberto Trevino, Texas prisoner # 578527, appeals from the
    district court’s dismissal of his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     civil rights
    complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, 42
    U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Trevino filed his suit after the effective date
    of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), and his case is thus
    governed by the provisions therein.    See Underwood v. Wilson, 151
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    F.3d 292, 293 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 
    119 S.Ct. 1809
     (1999).
    The PLRA amended § 1997e to require that a prisoner must exhaust
    his administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action.            See
    § 1997e(a). Trevino did not exhaust administrative remedies before
    filing   suit,   and   his   purported   exhaustion   of   administrative
    remedies during the pendency of his suit does not satisfy the
    requirements of § 1997e(a).         See Underwood, 151 F.3d at 296.
    Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal is AFFIRMED. Trevino’s
    motions for production of documents, a temporary restraining order,
    and an expedited ruling are DENIED.
    JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-40039

Filed Date: 11/17/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014