Charles Marsala v. Jerry Mayo ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 14-30988   Document: 00513410882   Page: 1     Date Filed: 03/08/2016
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-30988
    Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    CHARLES E. MARSALA,                                               March 8, 2016
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    Lyle W. Cayce
    v.                                                                    Clerk
    MICHAEL GRAY; A&S RECOVERY; SCIBMATT, L.L.C.,
    Defendants - Appellees
    Cons. w/ No. 14-31153
    CHARLES E. MARSALA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    JACKSONVILLE DINING CONCEPTS, L.L.C.
    Defendant - Appellee
    Cons. w/ No. 14-31182
    CHARLES E. MARSALA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    JERRY L. MAYO; MICHAEL GRAY; GERALD GABET, also known as JERRY
    GABET; A&S RECOVERY; JACKSONVILLE DINING CONCEPTS, L.L.C.;
    SCIBMATT, L.L.C.
    Defendants - Appellees,
    Case: 14-30988      Document: 00513410882         Page: 2    Date Filed: 03/08/2016
    No. 14-30988
    c/w No. 14-31153 & No. 14-31182
    Appeals from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 2:13-CV-6800
    Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Charles E. Marsala appeals the district court’s final judgment of
    dismissal. We conclude that Marsala has abandoned all his claims by failing
    to brief them adequately. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff
    Abner, 
    813 F.2d 744
    , 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Although his briefs are afforded
    liberal construction, Marsala is required to brief arguments in order to
    preserve them. See Yohey v. Collins, 
    985 F.2d 222
    , 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).
    Additionally, Marsala’s motions to supplement the record are DENIED; the
    proffered legal materials constitute briefing beyond the briefing cut-off date,
    and the proffered exhibits either duplicate documents already in the record or
    would improperly expand the record that was before the district court. See
    Theriot v. Parish of Jefferson, 
    185 F.3d 477
    , 491 n.26 (5th Cir. 1999).
    AFFIRMED.
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-31182

Filed Date: 3/8/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021