United States v. John Zimmerman , 700 F. App'x 369 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 17-40037      Document: 00514226318         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/06/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 17-40037                                 FILED
    Summary Calendar                       November 6, 2017
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JOHN CRAIG ZIMMERMAN,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:07-CR-232-1
    Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    John Craig Zimmerman, federal prisoner # 71281-179, appeals the
    district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of audita querela challenging the
    substantive reasonableness of the cumulative 300-month sentence imposed
    following his convictions for enticing a minor to engage in sexually explicit
    conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct,
    receiving child pornography, and possessing child pornography. Zimmerman
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-40037     Document: 00514226318      Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/06/2017
    No. 17-40037
    argues that he is entitled to relief in light of recent studies showing that
    recidivism rates for sex offenders are not as high as previously thought.
    Although the district court did not explain its decision denying
    Zimmerman’s       request   for   relief,   Zimmerman    cannot   challenge    the
    reasonableness of his sentence through a writ of audita querela. See United
    States v. Miller, 
    599 F.3d 484
    , 488 (5th Cir. 2010).          Further, although
    Zimmerman has filed a letter pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
    28 (j), we decline to address the issue raised therein because it is raised for the
    first time and relies on cases available before Zimmerman filed his opening
    brief.
    The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-40037 Summary Calendar

Citation Numbers: 700 F. App'x 369

Judges: Reavley, Prado, Graves

Filed Date: 11/6/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024