United States v. Juan Hernandez-Gaudillo ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 17-50478      Document: 00514280709         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/20/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 17-50478
    Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    December 20, 2017
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JUAN CARLOS HERNANDEZ-GAUDILLO, also known as Juan Caudillo,
    also known as Juan Gonzales-Hernandez, also known as Juan Trejo, Jr.,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:17-CR-71-1
    Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Carlos
    Hernandez-Gaudillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
    accordance with Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and United States
    v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
    (5th Cir. 2011).            Hernandez-Gaudillo has filed a
    response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-50478    Document: 00514280709     Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/20/2017
    No. 17-50478
    evaluation of Hernandez-Gaudillo’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel;
    we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral
    review. See United States v. Isgar, 
    739 F.3d 829
    , 841 (5th Cir. 2014); United
    States v. Corbett, 
    742 F.2d 173
    , 177 (5th Cir. 1984) (per curiam).
    We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
    reflected therein, as well as Hernandez-Gaudillo’s response. We concur with
    counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
    appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
    counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
    DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-50478

Filed Date: 12/20/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021