United States v. Santos Guevara-Giron ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 13-40573      Document: 00512540046         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/21/2014
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-40573
    Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    February 21, 2014
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    SANTOS EFRAIN GUEVARA-GIRON,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 2:13-CR-292-1
    Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos Efrain
    Guevara-Giron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
    accordance with Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and United States
    v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
    (5th Cir. 2011). Guevara-Giron has filed a response.
    The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of
    Guevara-Giron’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-40573    Document: 00512540046     Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/21/2014
    No. 13-40573
    generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim[s] ha[ve] not
    been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the
    record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 
    470 F.3d 1087
    , 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We
    have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
    therein, as well as Guevara-Giron’s response.       We concur with counsel’s
    assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
    from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
    5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-40573

Judges: Reavley, Owen, Southwick

Filed Date: 2/21/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024