Morris v. State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-20348         Document: 00516635815             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/06/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                                        United States Court of Appeals
    ____________                                       Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 22-20348                             February 6, 2023
    Summary Calendar                             Lyle W. Cayce
    ____________                                      Clerk
    John T. Morris,
    Plaintiff—Appellant,
    versus
    State of Texas; Greg Abbott, Governor of the State of Texas;
    John B. Scott, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of
    Texas,
    Defendants—Appellees.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:21-CV-3456
    ______________________________
    Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    John T. Morris filed a pro se civil rights suit under 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
    ,
    asserting that partisan gerrymandering of his congressional district and
    dishonest media coverage violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment
    rights and seeking injunctive relief. Morris appeals the district court’s
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 22-20348      Document: 00516635815          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/06/2023
    No. 22-20348
    Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) dismissal of his complaint without
    prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
    Our review is de novo. See Griener v. United States, 
    900 F.3d 700
    , 703
    (5th Cir. 2018). Morris has not met his burden of showing that he has raised
    justiciable claims. See Rucho v. Common Cause, 
    139 S. Ct. 2484
    , 2493-2508
    (2019); Abbott v. Perez, 
    138 S. Ct. 2305
    , 2324 (2018); Mi Familia Vota v.
    Abbott, 
    977 F.3d 461
    , 469-70 (5th Cir. 2020). As such, we need not reach
    Morris’s challenge to the district court’s alternative finding that the
    defendants are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-20348

Filed Date: 2/6/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/6/2023