United States v. David-Usuga ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-20134         Document: 00516644405             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/13/2023
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                                       United States Court of Appeals
    ____________                                      Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 22-20134                            February 13, 2023
    Summary Calendar                            Lyle W. Cayce
    ____________                                     Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Joaquin Guillermo David-Usuga,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:18-CR-469-1
    ______________________________
    Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam: *
    The attorney appointed to represent Joaquin Guillermo David-Usuga
    has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
     (5th Cir. 2011). David-Usuga has filed a response. The record is not
    sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of David-Usuga’s
    _____________________
    *
    This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
    Case: 22-20134     Document: 00516644405           Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/13/2023
    No. 22-20134
    claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider
    the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar,
    
    739 F.3d 829
    , 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
    We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
    record reflected therein, as well as David-Usuga’s response. We concur with
    counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
    appellate review.    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
    GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
    the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-20134

Filed Date: 2/13/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/14/2023