-
Case: 13-10610 Document: 00512457347 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-10610 December 2, 2013 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MITCHELL WAGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GILBERT CAMPUZANO, Regional Director TDCJ, Region VI; EDWARD L. WHEELER, Senior Warden; RICHARD G. LEAL, Assistant Warden, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CV-205 Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mitchell Wagner, Texas prisoner # 1543049, appeals the denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding. We lack jurisdiction to decide moot questions or issues that cannot affect the rights of the parties to the appeal. McRae v. Hogan,
576 F.2d 615, 617 (5th * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-10610 Document: 00512457347 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 No. 13-10610 Cir. 1978). The denial of a TRO is not appealable in light of the likelihood of mootness. In re Lieb,
915 F.2d 180, 183 (5th Cir. 1990). The denial of a preliminary injunction is appealable as an exception to the final-judgment rule. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1); Lakedreams v. Taylor,
932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991). However, during the pendency of Wagner’s appeal, the district court entered a final judgment dismissing Wagner’s § 1983 complaint, which contained a request for permanent injunctive relief. The entry of a final judgment regarding permanent injunctive relief renders any order regarding preliminary injunctive relief moot. See Louisiana World Exposition, Inc. v. Logue,
746 F.2d 1033, 1038 (5th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the instant appeal, which challenges only the denial of preliminary injunctive relief, is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as moot. APPEAL DISMISSED. 2
Document Info
Docket Number: 13-10610
Judges: Davis, Southwick, Higginson
Filed Date: 12/2/2013
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024