Mitchell Wagner v. Gilbert Campuzano ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 13-10610      Document: 00512457347         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/02/2013
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 13-10610                        December 2, 2013
    Summary Calendar
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    MITCHELL WAGNER,
    Plaintiff-Appellant
    v.
    GILBERT CAMPUZANO, Regional Director TDCJ, Region VI; EDWARD L.
    WHEELER, Senior Warden; RICHARD G. LEAL, Assistant Warden,
    Defendants-Appellees
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:12-CV-205
    Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Mitchell Wagner, Texas prisoner # 1543049, appeals the denial of his
    motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction in
    a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding.
    We lack jurisdiction to decide moot questions or issues that cannot affect
    the rights of the parties to the appeal. McRae v. Hogan, 
    576 F.2d 615
    , 617 (5th
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-10610     Document: 00512457347       Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/02/2013
    No. 13-10610
    Cir. 1978). The denial of a TRO is not appealable in light of the likelihood of
    mootness. In re Lieb, 
    915 F.2d 180
    , 183 (5th Cir. 1990). The denial of a
    preliminary injunction is appealable as an exception to the final-judgment
    rule. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1); Lakedreams v. Taylor, 
    932 F.2d 1103
    , 1107 (5th
    Cir. 1991). However, during the pendency of Wagner’s appeal, the district
    court entered a final judgment dismissing Wagner’s § 1983 complaint, which
    contained a request for permanent injunctive relief.         The entry of a final
    judgment regarding permanent injunctive relief renders any order regarding
    preliminary injunctive relief moot. See Louisiana World Exposition, Inc. v.
    Logue, 
    746 F.2d 1033
    , 1038 (5th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the instant appeal,
    which challenges only the denial of preliminary injunctive relief, is dismissed
    for lack of jurisdiction as moot.
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    2