United States v. Aleman-Alvarez ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                        IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 01-41018
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    VICENTE ALEMAN-ALVAREZ,
    Defendant-
    Appellant.
    -------------------------------------------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. L-01-CR-459-ALL
    -------------------------------------------------------
    June 7, 2002
    Before JOLLY, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Vicente Aleman-Alvarez (Aleman) has appealed his guilty-plea conviction of conspiracy to
    possess more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute it. We AFFIRM.
    Aleman contends that he is entitled to reversal because there was an inadequate factual basis
    for his plea. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(f). He relies on his assertion that he did not know that he was
    transporting more than 30 kilograms of cocaine, but thought that only a small quantity of marijuana
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
    published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    was involved. Aleman asserts that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
    (2000), has abrogated
    United St ates v. Valencia-Gonzales 
    172 F.3d 344
    (5th Cir. 1999), which states that the relevant
    ,
    statutes mandate “a strict liability punishment based on which controlled substance, and how much
    of it, is involved in the offense.”
    Aleman’s contention is refuted by the transcript of his rearraignment hearing. In that
    proceeding, he admitted under oath that he had agreed to transport the cocaine from Coahuila,
    Mexico, to San Antonio, Texas, for renumeration. Thus, there was an ample factual basis even if it
    is assumed that now a defendant in a drug-trafficking case must know what drug and how much of
    it was involved. See United States v. Peters, 
    283 F.3d 300
    , 307 (5th Cir.)(elements of drug-
    conspiracy offense), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Apr. 4, 2002) (No. 01-9578).
    AFFIRMED.
    -2-