Jesse Herrera v. Brian Smith ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 18-41164      Document: 00515097965         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/29/2019
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 18-41164                            FILED
    Summary Calendar                    August 29, 2019
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    JESSE HERRERA,
    Petitioner-Appellant
    v.
    BRIAN SMITH; ANTONIO ANINAO,
    Respondents-Appellees
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 9:18-CV-21
    Before WIENER, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Jesse Herrera, Texas prisoner # 684864, is serving a 45-year sentence
    for a 1994 murder conviction. He appeals the dismissal of his petition under
    28 U.S.C. § 2241, in which he challenged the result of his prior 28 U.S.C. § 2254
    proceeding.     The district court construed the petition as a successive and
    unauthorized § 2254 petition.
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-41164    Document: 00515097965     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/29/2019
    No. 18-41164
    A threshold question is whether a state prisoner is required to obtain a
    certificate of appealability (COA) before appealing the dismissal of a habeas
    petition purportedly brought under § 2241. In this case, Herrera is required
    to obtain a COA because he is challenging a “final order in a habeas corpus
    proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued
    by a State court.” § 2253(c)(1)(A); see Stringer v. Williams, 
    161 F.3d 259
    , 262
    (5th Cir. 1998). However, we have no jurisdiction to grant or deny a COA
    where the district court did not deny or grant a COA. See Black v. Davis, 
    902 F.3d 541
    , 545 (5th Cir. 2018).
    Accordingly, this appeal is HELD IN ABEYANCE and the case is
    REMANDED for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to consider
    whether Herrera should be granted a COA from the dismissal of his § 2241
    petition. Herrera’s motion to supplement the record is carried with the case.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-41164

Filed Date: 8/29/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/30/2019