United States v. Joseph Berzat ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 19-20032      Document: 00515204967         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/19/2019
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 19-20032
    Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    November 19, 2019
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JOSEPH BERZAT,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeals from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:17-CR-254-1
    Before STEWART, DENNIS, and HO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Berzat has moved for leave
    to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
     (5th Cir. 2011).
    Berzat has filed a response and an incorporated motion to appoint new counsel,
    which is DENIED. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make
    a fair evaluation of Berzat’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-20032    Document: 00515204967     Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/19/2019
    No. 19-20032
    therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to his petition for
    collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 
    739 F.3d 829
    , 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
    We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
    reflected therein, as well as Berzat’s response. We concur in counsel’s
    assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
    To the extent that Berzat challenges Count 2 of his conviction for aiding and
    abetting the use and discharge of a firearm during the commission of a crime
    of violence and his sentence, his arguments are barred by the waiver provision
    in his knowing and voluntary plea agreement. Accordingly, the motion for
    leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
    responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-20032

Filed Date: 11/20/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/20/2019