Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 19-30277                        November 19, 2019
    Summary Calendar
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    JANE DOE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    CITY OF BATON ROUGE; JAMES WEBER; CHARLES DOTSON;
    STEPHEN MURPHY; S. CAREY, ET AL,
    Defendants - Appellees
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 3:19-CV-48
    Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Jane Doe appeals the district court’s order dismissing her case with
    prejudice, arguing that the dismissal should have been without prejudice. We
    agree and therefore REVERSE.
    “[A] plaintiff has an absolute right to dismiss a lawsuit before the
    defendant has filed an answer or summary judgment motion.” Carter v. United
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 19-30277
    States, 
    547 F.2d 258
    , 259 (5th Cir. 1977).       The defendants here had no
    opportunity to do either of those things—they had, after all, not been served
    with the complaint. The plaintiff thus still possessed the legal right to dismiss
    her case without prejudice. See FED. R. CIV. PRO. 41(a)(1). The judgment is
    REVERSED, and the case is remanded with instructions to enter an order
    dismissing Jane Doe’s complaint without prejudice.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-30277

Filed Date: 11/20/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/21/2019