-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 8, 2007 No. 06-61034 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk JAMES ALTON GIPSON Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROCKY WILLIAMSON, Officer; DERRICK MINGO; ALANDO SELLERS, Officer Defendants-Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:04-CV-00213 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* James Alton Gipson, Mississippi prisoner # 21821, filed a
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint in which he asserted, inter alia, an excessive force claim against Rocky Williamson, Derrick Mingo, and Alando Sellers, correctional officers at the Marion/Walthall Correctional Facility (MWCF). Williamson, Mingo, and Sellers now appeal the district court’s rejection of the qualified immunity defense * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-61034 asserted in their motion for summary judgment. See Hampton v. Oktibbeha County Sheriff Dep’t,
480 F.3d 358, 363 (5th Cir. 2007). The district court’s finding that there was insufficient evidence in the record to analyze the issue of the reasonableness of the appellants’ conduct determined only a question of “evidence sufficiency.” See Johnson v. Jones,
515 U.S. 304, 313 (1995). As such, it is not a final, appealable order. See
id.“Unlike denials of qualified immunity which are immediately appealable because they turn on an issue of law,” Boulos v. Wilson,
834 F.2d 504, 509 (5th Cir. 1987) (citing Mitchell v. Forsyth,
472 U.S. 511(1985)), the appellants’ immunity defense turns on the factual issue “whether force was applied in a good faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm.” Valencia v. Wiggins,
981 F.2d 1440, 1446 (5th Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks and footnote citations omitted). As the presence of a genuine issue of material fact regarding qualified immunity precludes this court from exercising jurisdiction, this appeal must be dismissed. Johnson,
515 U.S. at 313-20. APPEAL DISMISSED. 2
Document Info
Docket Number: 06-61034
Citation Numbers: 253 F. App'x 461
Judges: Higginbotham, Stewart, Owen
Filed Date: 11/8/2007
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024