United States v. Mario Miranda-Ontiveros ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 18-40392      Document: 00515233836         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/12/2019
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 18-40392                         FILED
    Summary Calendar               December 12, 2019
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    MARIO RAYMUNDO MIRANDA-ONTIVEROS ,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:16-CR-178-3
    Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    A jury convicted Mario Raymundo Miranda-Ontiveros of conspiring to
    possess with the intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21
    U.S.C. § 846. The district court sentenced him to 360 months in prison. For
    the first time on appeal, he challenges the district court’s application of the
    two-level importation enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(5). We review
    for plain error. See Puckett v. United States, 
    556 U.S. 129
    , 135 (2009).
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-40392    Document: 00515233836     Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/12/2019
    No. 18-40392
    Miranda-Ontiveros’s argument that § 2D1.1(b)(5) has a mens rea
    requirement is foreclosed by United States v. Serfass, 
    684 F.3d 548
    , 552 (5th
    Cir. 2012), and United States v. Foulks, 
    747 F.3d 914
    , 915 (5th Cir. 2014).
    Because    Miranda-Ontiveros’s     remaining     arguments     regarding     the
    § 2D1.1(b)(5) enhancement raise factual issues which could have been resolved
    by the district court upon proper objection at sentencing, he cannot show plain
    error. See 
    Serfass, 684 F.3d at 553-54
    ; United States v. Lopez, 
    923 F.2d 47
    , 50
    (5th Cir. 1991).
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-40392

Filed Date: 12/12/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/13/2019