United States v. Miguel Ramirez , 506 F. App'x 279 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 11-20799       Document: 00512085664         Page: 1     Date Filed: 12/17/2012
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    December 17, 2012
    No. 11-20799
    Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    MIGUEL ANGEL GOMEZ RAMIREZ, also known as Miguel Angel Gomez, also
    known as Miguel Angel Gomez-Ramirez,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:11-CR-367-1
    Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Gomez
    Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
    with Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
     (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez Ramirez has filed a response. The record is
    insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Gomez Ramirez’s
    claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 11-20799    Document: 00512085664     Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/17/2012
    No. 11-20799
    resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district
    court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the
    allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 
    470 F.3d 1087
    , 1091 (5th Cir. 2006)
    (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s
    brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gomez
    Ramirez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
    presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for
    leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
    herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-20799

Citation Numbers: 506 F. App'x 279

Filed Date: 12/18/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021