Herrera Calle v. Garland ( 2023 )

Case: 22-60388 Document: 00516661062 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/01/2023
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 22-60388 March 1, 2023
Summary Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
____________
Clerk
Guillermo De Jesus Herrera Calle; Brahyan Herrera
Ruiz; Dione Julieth Ruiz Arias,
Petitioners,
versus
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General,
Respondent.
______________________________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Agency No. A206 389 051
Agency No. A206 389 052
Agency No. A206 389 053
______________________________
Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
Guillermo De Jesus Herrera Calle petitions this court for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying a motion to reconsider a
decision overturning an Immigration Judge’s grant of asylum and
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-60388 Document: 00516661062 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/01/2023
No. 22-60388
withholding of removal and remanding for consideration of eligibility for
relief under the Convention Against Torture. 1
We must always be aware of our jurisdiction. Zhao v. Gonzales, 404
F.3d 295, 302 & n.3 (5th Cir. 2005). Under our statutory authority, we may
review a “final order of removal” in immigration proceedings. 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(1); see Moreira v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 709, 713 (5th Cir. 2007). Our
jurisdiction to review final orders of removal “encompasses review of
decisions refusing to reopen or reconsider such orders.” Mata v. Lynch, 576
U.S. 143, 147 (2015) (internal citations omitted). Because Herrera Calle’s
petition for review challenges neither a final order of removal nor a
“decision[] refusing to reopen or reconsider” a final order of removal, Mata,
576 U.S. at 147, we lack jurisdiction over it. See § 1252(a)(1). The petition
for review is DISMISSED.
_____________________
1
The other petitioners were derivatives on Herrera Calle’s application for relief.
2