David Paul v. John Williams ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 19-30379      Document: 00515213953         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/26/2019
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    No. 19-30379
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    Summary Calendar                     November 26, 2019
    Lyle W. Cayce
    DAVID P. PAUL, J.D.,                                                           Clerk
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    JOHN V. WILLIAMS, Medical Doctor,
    Defendant - Appellee
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Louisiana
    3:18-CV-646
    Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges
    PER CURIAM:*
    Appellant David Paul filed a pro se tort action against Appellee Dr. John
    Williams seeking relief for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”).
    The magistrate judge dismissed Paul’s claim with prejudice because his claim
    prescribed, there was no basis for extending the one-year prescriptive period,
    and his pleadings failed to include a claim upon which relief could be granted.
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-30379    Document: 00515213953     Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/26/2019
    No. 19-30379
    As an initial matter, we must examine the basis of jurisdiction, on our
    own motion if necessary. Hill v. City of Seven Points, 
    230 F.3d 167
    , 169 (5th
    Cir. 2000). Pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 2107
    (a) and Federal Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 4(a)(1)(A), the notice of appeal in a civil case must be filed within
    thirty days of entry of judgment. The district court entered the final judgment
    dismissing the complaint on April 9, 2019. Therefore, the final day for filing a
    timely notice of appeal was May 9, 2019. The envelope which Paul used to
    FedEx overnight his notice of appeal indicates a shipping date of May 9, 2019,
    but the notice was stamped as received and filed in the Clerk’s Office on May
    10, 2019. When set by statute, the time limitation for filing a notice of appeal
    in a civil case is jurisdictional. Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi.,
    
    138 S.Ct. 13
    , 17 (2017); Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    Accordingly, the lack of a timely notice mandates dismissal of the appeal.
    Robbins v. Maggio, 
    750 F.2d 405
    , 408 (5th Cir. 1985).
    Alternatively, we have reviewed the briefs, the applicable law, and the
    relevant portions of the record. The rulings of the district court are AFFIRMED
    for essentially the reasons explained in the district court’s April 9, 2019
    dismissal order.
    2