United States v. Chadrick McBride ( 2019 )

Case: 19-10201 Document: 00515223249 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/04/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 19-10201 December 4, 2019
Conference Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CHADRICK DESHAWN MCBRIDE,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:18-CR-20-9
Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Chadrick Deshawn McBride has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). McBride has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of McBride’s claims of
ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-10201 Document: 00515223249 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/04/2019
No. 19-10201
without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829,
841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as McBride’s response. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2