United States v. Battley ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    For the Fifth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 99-31083
    ___________________________
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    VERSUS
    VERNESSA BATTLEY,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ___________________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    Middle District of Louisiana
    (99-CR-38-ALL-B)
    ___________________________________________________
    September 11, 2000
    Before WOOD*, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:**
    Appellant Vernessa Battley pleaded guilty to an indictment
    charging her with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.      
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g)(1).      The district court sentenced Battley to a
    federal prison term of 87 months, a penalty at the top of the
    guideline range.     The district court explained that it arrived at
    this sentence after concluding that Battley had a prior conviction
    *
    Honorable Harlington Wood, Jr., Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for
    the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.
    **
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    for a crime of violence –- a 1995 Louisiana state conviction of
    enticing persons into prostitution.               See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A)
    (stating that the offense level for the offense of felon in
    possession of a firearm is 20                   if the defendant had a prior
    conviction for a crime of violence).
    Battley challenges this sentence, arguing that the district
    court applied the wrong guideline.               Although Battley concedes that
    she has a prior conviction for enticing persons into prostitution,
    she contends that enticement into prostitution does not qualify as
    a crime of violence.         For the reasons that follow, we disagree and
    affirm Battley’s sentence.
    I.
    Section 2K2.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines establishes
    the base offense levels for unlawful possession of firearms.
    Section 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) states that sentencing judges should apply
    a   base   level   of   20    if   “the   defendant     had   one   prior   felony
    conviction of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance
    offense.”     Section 4B1.2(a), in turn, defines a crime of violence
    as:
    any offense under federal or state law, punishable by
    imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that –-
    (1) has as an element the use, attempted use, or
    threatened use of physical force against the person of
    another, or (2) is burglary of a dwelling, arson, or
    extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise
    involves conduct that presents a serious potential
    risk of physical injury to another.
    See U.S.S.G. § 2k2.1, n.5 (1998) (adopting definitions in § 4B1.2).
    -2-
    When determining whether an offense constitutes a crime of
    violence under 4B1.2(a), we must first look to the statutory
    elements of the crime, inquiring whether the elements of the crime
    itself require the state to show that the defendant threatened
    physical force, burgled a building, exposed others to a serious
    risk of physical injury, etc.     See United States v. Jackson, 
    2000 WL 1028991
    , *3 & n.3 (5th Cir. July 26, 2000).             If the   statute
    itself does not impose such a “categorical” requirement, we then
    look to the charging instrument to see whether the defendant’s
    conduct falls within section 4B1.2(a)’s definition of a crime of
    violence.     
    Id. at *3
    .     As this Court has recently explained,
    however, “we may not ... consider the specific conduct underlying
    [a Defendant’s] convictions unless that conduct were included in
    the charging instrument for those offenses.”         
    Id.
    Viewing Battley’s conviction “categorically,” we conclude that
    the crime of enticing persons into prostitution is a crime of
    violence as defined by section 4B1.2(a). By enticing persons, in
    this case, her two minor stepdaughters, into prostitution, Battley
    undoubtedly exposed them to “a serious risk of physical injury.”
    See § 4B1.2(a). The well-documented perils of prostitution include
    contracting   sexually   transmitted     diseases,   suffering      physical
    abuse, rape, and murder by clients, and a wide-variety of other
    physiological harms.       See e.g., Sylvia A. Law, Commercial Sex:
    Beyond Decriminalization, 
    73 S. Cal. L. Rev. 523
    , 533 & nn. 47-50
    -3-
    (2000)(noting a “study of 130 street prostitutes in San Fransisco
    found    that   82%   had   been   physically        assaulted,        83%    had     been
    threatened with a weapon [and], 68% had been raped while working as
    prostitutes”); Margaret A. Baldwin, Split at the Root: Prostitution
    and Feminist Discourses of Law Reform, 5 Yale J.L. & Feminisim 47,
    89   (1992)(citing      Canadian     study         that    women       and    girls     in
    prostitution      suffer    a   mortality     rate        40   times    the    national
    average); Catharine A. MacKinnon, Prostitution and Civil Rights, 1
    Mich J. Gender & L. 13, 25 (1993)(“No social institution exceeds
    [prostitution] in its physical violence.”). These inherent dangers
    easily surpass, both in terms of severity and likelihood, risks
    that we have found attendant to other crimes and sufficient to
    bring those crimes within the grasp of 4B1.2(a). See, e.g., United
    States    v.    DeSantiago-Gonzalez,         
    207 F.3d 261
    ,   264    (5th     Cir.
    2000)(holding that driving while intoxicated constitutes a crime of
    violence because it involves serious risk of physical injury);
    United States v. Galvan-Rodriguez, 
    169 F.3d 217
    , 219-20 (5th Cir.),
    cert. denied --- U.S. --—, 
    120 S.Ct. 100
     (1999)(holding that
    unauthorized use of a motor vehicle constitutes a crime of violence
    because of the “substantial risk that the vehicle might become
    involved in an accident”).         Thus, the district court did not err in
    concluding that Battley had previously been convicted of a crime of
    violence.
    AFFIRMED.
    -4-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-31083

Filed Date: 9/14/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021