United States v. Gardner ( 1998 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 98-40201
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JEFFREY WAYNE GARDNER,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:97-CR-54-ALL
    - - - - - - - - - -
    November 16, 1998
    Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Jeffrey Wayne Gardner appeals his sentence following a
    guilty plea conviction of theft concerning programs receiving
    federal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A).     Gardner
    argues that the district court erred by increasing his base
    offense level (1) by two levels for his role as an organizer,
    leader, manager or supervisor of criminal activity pursuant to
    U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c); (2) by six levels because he “otherwise
    used” a firearm pursuant to § 2B3.1(b)(2); and (3) by one level
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 98-40201
    -2-
    pursuant to § 2B3.1(b)(6) because the loss to the victim was more
    than $10,000.
    We have reviewed the record including the presentence report
    (PSR) and have determined that the district court did not clearly
    err in its factual findings and did not misapply the Sentencing
    Guidelines in sentencing Gardner.   See United States v. Manthei,
    
    913 F.2d 1130
    , 1135-37 (5th Cir. 1990)(the “offense” for purposes
    of § 3B1.1 includes criminal activity greater in scope than the
    activity comprising the elements of the offense charged); United
    States v. Fletcher, 
    121 F.3d 187
    , 198 (5th Cir. 1997)(the
    "otherwise-used" enhancement includes a situation where a
    defendant both points a weapon at a victim and also explicitly
    threatens the victim); United States v. Cockerham, 
    919 F.2d 286
    ,
    289 (5th Cir. 1990)(loss under § 2B1.1 “includes the value of all
    property taken, even that recovered or returned”).
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-40201

Filed Date: 11/24/1998

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014