United States v. Moreno ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 98-20788
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JUAN MORENO,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ---------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. H-98-CV-418
    ---------------------
    December 10, 1998
    Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its
    own motion if necessary.     United States v. Lister, 
    53 F.3d 66
    , 68
    (5th Cir. 1995).   Fed. R. Crim. P. 4(b) requires that a notice of
    appeal by a defendant in a criminal case be filed within ten days
    of entry of judgment.   Because the appeal is from the denial of a
    motion invoking Fed. R. Crim. P. 33, Rule 4(b) governs the
    timeliness of the notice of appeal.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 98-20788
    - 2 -
    Rule 4(b) allows the district court to grant an additional
    30 days in which to file the notice of appeal upon a showing of
    excusable neglect.    This court customarily treats the filing of
    an untimely notice of appeal within the 30-day period as a motion
    for a determination whether excusable neglect entitles the
    defendant to an extension of time to appeal.     See United States
    v. Golding, 
    739 F.2d 183
    , 184 (5th Cir. 1984).
    The district court’s order was entered on July 31, 1998.
    The notice of appeal was apparently signed and delivered to
    prison authorities on August 11, 1998--one day late.     See Fed. R.
    App. P. 4(b) & 26(a).   We therefore remand the case to the
    district court for a determination whether defendant’s untimely
    filing of the notice of appeal was due to excusable neglect.
    Upon making the determination, the district court shall return
    the case to this court for further proceedings or dismissal, as
    may be appropriate.
    REMANDED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-20788

Filed Date: 1/13/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014