Kabeya v. Ashcroft ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                          United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 1, 2003
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 02-60846
    Summary Calendar
    YVETTE KABEYA,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Respondent.
    --------------------
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    BIA No. A76-802-732
    --------------------
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Yvette Kabeya petitions for review of an order of the Board
    of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the immigration judge’s
    (“IJ’s”) decision to deny her application for asylum and
    withholding of removal.    Kabeya also moves this court to stay the
    final order of removal that has been entered against her.         Kabeya
    argues that the BIA erred by affirming the IJ’s determination
    that she was not credible and thus had not shown that she was
    entitled to asylum.    The IJ’s credibility determination was based
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-60846
    -2-
    on inconsistencies among Kabeya’s statements and testimony, her
    failure to provide detail with respect to certain portions of her
    testimony, her failure to provide corroborating documentary
    evidence, and the implausible nature of her account.
    This court will uphold the factual finding that an alien is
    not eligible for asylum if that finding is supported by
    substantial evidence.    Chun v. INS, 
    40 F.3d 76
    , 78-79 (5th Cir.
    1994).   The substantial-evidence standard requires that the IJ’s
    decision be based on the evidence presented and that the decision
    be substantially reasonable.    Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 
    78 F.3d 194
    , 197 (5th Cir. 1996).   The IJ’s decision is supported by
    substantial evidence, and the record does not compel a contrary
    conclusion.   
    Id.
       Accordingly, Kabeya’s petition for review and
    motion for stay of removal are DENIED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-60846

Judges: Higginbotham, Davis, Prado

Filed Date: 10/1/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024