United States v. Castano ( 2001 )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
No. 00-20840
(Summary Calendar)
_________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ALFONSO CASTANO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
Dist. Ct. No. H-93-CR-211-5
July 11, 2001
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alfonso Castano (“Castano”) appeals the district court’s reentry of judgment, which followed
our order vacating the district court’s denial of Castano’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, vacating the
judgment of conviction, and remanding for the reentry of judgment and the opportunity to appeal the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
new judgment. See United States v. Castano, 217 F.3d 889 (5th Cir. 2000). A review of the record
indicates that Castano knowingly and voluntarily entered into his guilty plea and that the district court
complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11’s requirements. See United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 298
(5th Cir. 1993). Additionally, the record demonstrates that Castano’s waiver of appeal was knowing
and voluntary, and, therefore, enforceable. See United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir.
1994).
Castano contends that the district court abused its discretion when it failed to hold an
evidentiary hearing on Castano’s § 2255 claim he received ineffective assistance of counsel due to
his attorney’s failure to advise that “his presence in the ‘stash house’ did not necessarily make him
a party to the possession of the drugs found at the house.” This contention is without merit. Castano
has previously been denied a COA on this ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Moreover, the
appeal before us is an out of time direct appeal; his § 2255 motion is not before us.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM Castano’s conviction and sentence.
-2-