United States v. Green ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________________
    No. 00-20245
    ________________________________
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Dennis Lee Green,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _____________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    For the Southern District of Texas
    (H-99-CR-510-1)
    _____________________________________________
    August 13, 2001
    Before DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges, and PRADO*, District Judge.
    PER CURIAM:**
    Dennis Lee Green challenges the sufficiency of the factual
    basis for his plea of guilty to conspiracy to commit arson in
    violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 371
    .    The facts of this case are very
    similar to those of United States v. Johnson, 
    194 F.3d 657
     (5th
    Cir. 1999), vacated by 
    530 U.S. 1201
    , 
    120 S.Ct. 2193
     (2000), on
    remand, 
    246 F.3d 749
     (5th Cir. 2001), where we held that the facts
    presented by the government were insufficient to show that the
    *
    District Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting by
    designation.
    **
    Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
    church burned by the defendant was actively employed for commercial
    purposes.   Likewise, the facts presented by the government in this
    case are insufficient to show that the Bryan United Pentecostal
    Church was actively employed for commercial purposes.     See also
    Jones v. United States, 
    529 U.S. 848
    , 
    120 S.Ct. 1904
    , 
    146 L.Ed.2d 902
     (2000); United States v. Odom, __ F.3d __, 
    2001 WL 585710
     (11th
    Cir. 2001); United States v. Rea, 
    223 F.3d 741
     (8th Cir. 2000).
    Accordingly, there was an insufficient factual basis for Green’s
    plea. We therefore VACATE Green’s plea and REMAND this case to the
    district court for further proceedings.
    VACATED AND REMANDED.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-20245

Filed Date: 8/15/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014