United States v. Burton ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 01-20395
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    BOBBY JOE BURTON, JR,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. H-97-CR-36-3
    - - - - - - - - - -
    December 11, 2001
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Bobby Joe Burton, Jr., appeals his sentence on remand from a
    jury trial and conviction for various drug trafficking offenses.
    Burton argues that (1) the indictment failed to allege a drug
    quantity in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
    (2000); (2) 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) is unconstitutional; (3) the
    sentence enhancement based on a prior felony drug conviction
    violated Apprendi because the prior felony was not alleged in the
    indictment; and (4) the sentence under the guidelines violated
    Apprendi because the indictment did not allege a leadership role.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 01-20395
    -2-
    Although Burton’s indictment did not allege a drug quantity
    or leadership role, he was not sentenced in excess of the 30-year
    statutory maximum under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C).       Consequently,
    there was no Apprendi violation.     United States v. Doggett, 
    230 F.3d 160
    , 166 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
    121 S. Ct. 1152
    (2001); United States v. Keith, 
    230 F.3d 784
    , 787 (5th Cir.
    2000), cert. denied, 
    121 S. Ct. 1163
    (2001).        Apprendi does not
    invalidate a court’s factual findings for purposes of determining
    the applicable Sentencing Guidelines.       
    Id. Likewise, the
    indictment need not allege a prior felony conviction under
    Apprendi.     See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
    ,
    235 (1998); see also United States v. Dabeit, 
    231 F.3d 979
    , 984
    (5th Cir. 2000)(noting that the Supreme Court in Apprendi
    expressly declined to overrule Almendarez-Torres), cert. denied,
    
    121 S. Ct. 1214
    (2001).     The constitutionality of 21 U.S.C.
    § 841(b) has been upheld by this court.       See United States v.
    Slaughter, 
    238 F.3d 580
    (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    121 S. Ct. 2015
    (2001).     Accordingly, Burton’s sentence is AFFIRMED.