Miller v. FL Gas Transmission ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    _______________________
    No. 01-30262
    Civil Docket #99-CV-824
    _______________________
    MINOS D. MILLER, JR., as Trustee on behalf of
    Minos D. Miller, Sr. Trust; RUTH LOYD MILLER, as Trustee on behalf
    of Minos D. Miller, Sr. Trust; RICHARD MILLER, as Trustee on behalf
    of Miller Partnership,
    Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    versus
    FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION, CO.,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Louisiana
    _________________________________________________________________
    December 13, 2001
    Before JONES, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.*
    PER CURIAM:
    The court has carefully considered this appeal in light
    of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record.   Having done so
    we find no reversible error of law or fact.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    In    particular,   the   district      court   did   not    err   in
    concluding that no “other paper” was filed for purposes of starting
    the clock running on removal from state court until that court
    deemed certain admissions against appellants. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b).
    Further, under the circumstances of this case, the statement
    contained in one of the parties’ contracts that disputes would be
    resolved in “Louisiana’s courts” did not waive appellee’s right to
    remove the dispute to federal court.          Finally, we find no error in
    the   district    court’s   reasoning      construing   the   1989      easement
    agreement   and    the   1994   release.      The    intent   and    effect    of
    contractual provisions in both situations are clear.
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-30262

Filed Date: 12/14/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021