Geneve Butane, Inc. v. National Oil Corporation, e ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 12-20756   Document: 00512505498    Page: 1   Date Filed: 01/20/2014
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 12-20756                        January 8, 2014
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    GENEVE BUTANE, INCORPORATED,
    Plaintiff–Appellant Cross Appellee,
    v.
    NATIONAL OIL CORPORATION,
    Defendant,
    v.
    BP AMERICA, INCORPORATED,
    Garnishee-Appellee Cross Appellant,
    EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; HESS CORPORATION; OCCIDENTAL
    PETROLEUM CORPORATION,
    Garnishees–Appellees.
    Appeals from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    No. 4:12-CV-2205
    Before OWEN, SOUTHWICK, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
    Case: 12-20756         Document: 00512505498          Page: 2    Date Filed: 01/20/2014
    No. 12-20756
    PER CURIAM:*
    Plaintiff Geneve Butane appeals the district court’s denial of its request
    for additional discovery, the dismissal of its Supplemental Rule B proceeding,
    and the vacatur of its order of attachment. We review the district court’s order
    vacating the maritime attachment and dismissing the proceeding for an abuse
    of discretion, though the legal conclusions underlying the order are reviewed
    de novo. 1 We review the denial of the request for additional discovery for an
    abuse of discretion. 2
    The parties are familiar with the facts of this case. After considering the
    district court’s decision, the briefing, and the oral arguments, we conclude that
    the district court did not abuse its discretion in vacating the attachment and
    dismissing the proceeding without prejudice. We also conclude that the district
    court did not abuse its discretion in denying Geneve additional discovery.
    Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    1 Vitol, S.A. v. Primerose Shipping Co., 
    708 F.3d 527
    , 541 (4th Cir. 2013); Shipping
    Corp. of India v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd., 
    585 F.3d 58
    , 66 (2d Cir. 2009); cf. Great Prize, S.A.
    v. Mariner Shipping Party, Ltd., 
    967 F.2d 157
    , 160 (5th Cir. 1992).
    2   United States ex rel. Taylor-Vick v. Smith, 
    513 F.3d 228
    , 232 (5th Cir. 2008).
    2