Chavez v. United States ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 01-50833
    Conference Calendar
    ADAN CHAVEZ,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. A-01-CV-464-JN
    --------------------
    December 12, 2002
    Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Adan Chavez, federal prisoner # 51181-079 (“Chavez”) was
    convicted in 1991 for conspiracy and possession of marijuana and
    cocaine with intent to distribute.   He appeals the district
    court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, arguing that
    he is entitled to relief under the "savings clause" of 28 U.S.C.
    § 2255.   Chavez relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
    (2000), in support of his argument that his conviction and
    sentence are invalid because his indictment did not allege a drug
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 01-50833
    -2-
    quantity.   He argues that Apprendi is a retroactively available
    decision of the Supreme Court.
    "[T]he savings clause of § 2255 applies to a claim (i) that
    is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision
    which establishes that the petitioner may have been convicted of
    a nonexistent offense and (ii) that was foreclosed by circuit law
    at the time when the claim should have been raised in the
    petitioner's trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion."   Reyes-
    Requena v. United States, 
    243 F.3d 893
    , 904 (5th Cir. 2001).
    This court has recently rejected a petitioner's savings-clause
    argument based on Apprendi, holding that the petitioner could
    not satisfy the first prong of Reyes-Requena because Apprendi
    is not retroactive on collateral review.   See Wesson v. U.S.
    Penitentiary, Beaumont, TX, 
    305 F.3d 343
    , 347-48 (5th Cir. 2002).
    Accordingly, the district court's dismissal of Chavez's
    petition is AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-50833

Filed Date: 12/13/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021