United States v. Guzman ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 01-41474
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    FEDERICO GUZMAN, also known as Jesus Garcia-Perez, also known as
    Jesus Garcia-Garcia, also known as Juaquin (Joaquin) Alvarez-
    Perez, also known as Federico Guzman, also known as Federico
    Garcia-Guzman, also known as Ernesto Rivera-Garcia, also known as
    Federico Guzman Garcia, also known as Ernesto Rivera Garcia, also
    known as Jose Garcia Perez, also known as Joaquin Alvarez Perez,
    also known as Federico Garcia Guzman,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. B-00-CR-115-1
    --------------------
    January 6, 2003
    Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Federico Guzman was convicted of making a false statement to
    an immigration officer.     He now appeals the district court’s
    revocation of the supervised release imposed as a result of that
    conviction, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support
    a finding that he violated 
    8 U.S.C. § 1324
     by attempting to
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    transport aliens.
    The district court’s finding that Guzman attempted to transport
    aliens is supported by at least a preponderance of the evidence
    when that evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to the
    Government;   therefore,   the   district   court   did   not   abuse   its
    discretion in revoking Guzman’s supervised release.             See United
    States v. Grandlund, 
    71 F.3d 507
    , 509 n.2 (5th Cir. 1995) (applying
    preponderance of the evidence standard), clarified by, United
    States v. Grandlund, 
    77 F.3d 811
     (5th Cir. 1996); United States v.
    Alaniz-Alaniz, 
    38 F.3d 788
    , 792 (5th Cir. 1994) (on review of a
    challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, the evidence is
    viewed in a light most favorable to the Government).
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-41474

Filed Date: 1/7/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021