Malelli v. Gonzales ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                         United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   June 26, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-60150
    Summary Calendar
    ZARIF MALELLI; NEKIJE KELOLLI MALELLI,
    Petitioners,
    versus
    ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Respondent.
    --------------------
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    BIA No. A96 282 952
    A96 202 953
    --------------------
    Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Zarif Malelli and Nekije Kelolli Malelli petition for review
    of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying their
    applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under
    the Convention Against Torture (CAT).    This court lacks
    jurisdiction to consider the denial of their application for
    asylum because the BIA denied the application as untimely.         See
    8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3).
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 05-60150
    -2-
    To obtain withholding of removal, an applicant “must show
    that it is more likely than not that his life or freedom would be
    threatened by persecution” based on his political opinion, race,
    religion, nationality, or membership in a particular social
    group.   Efe v. Ashcroft, 
    293 F.3d 899
    , 906-07 (5th Cir. 2002)
    (quotation omitted).   We review for substantial evidence the
    determination that an alien is not entitled to withholding of
    removal.   See 
    id. at 905-06.
      To grant a petition for review
    regarding a CAT claim, the record must compel a finding that the
    alien has shown that it was more likely than not that he would be
    tortured if returned to his home country.     See Bah v. Ashcroft,
    
    341 F.3d 348
    , 351-52 (5th Cir. 2003).     The record does not compel
    a finding the petitioners have met their burden to show they were
    entitled to withholding of removal or relied under the CAT.
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-60150

Judges: Barksdale, Stewart, Clement

Filed Date: 6/26/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024