HBF Financial v. Delp ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    _______________________
    No. 99-10040
    _______________________
    IN THE MATTER OF: BILLY RAY DELP, JR.,
    Debtor.
    HBF FINANCIAL, LTD.,
    Appellee,
    versus
    BILLY RAY DELP, JR.,
    Appellant.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    (4:96-CV-235-Y)
    _________________________________________________________________
    December 14, 1999
    Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    This court has carefully considered the briefs, oral
    arguments of counsel, and the lower courts’ orders in order to
    determine whether we have appellate jurisdiction.       The parties are
    well aware of this court’s settled jurisprudence that when a
    district court, sitting in review of a bankruptcy court judgment,
    remands the case to the bankruptcy court for significant further
    proceedings,   this   court   lacks   jurisdiction   over   the   district
    court’s order. See, e.g., Beal Bank, S.S.B. v. Caddo Parish-Villas
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    South, Ltd., (Matter of Caddo Parish-Villas South, Ltd.), 
    174 F.3d 624
    (5th Cir. 1999).          Viewed in light of this jurisprudence, it
    appears to us that the district court’s opinion on appeal intended
    to   remand     this   case    for   some   type   of   significant   further
    proceedings in the bankruptcy court. This conclusion is reinforced
    by the district court’s pointed reference to the fact that the
    bankruptcy court “did not base its ruling on any of the other
    arguments raised in Delp’s brief.”
    Accordingly,    this   appeal   is   DISMISSED   for    lack   of
    jurisdiction.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-10040

Filed Date: 12/15/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014