United States v. Limon ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  April 17, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-40652
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JUAN ALBERTO LIMON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 5:04-CR-2356-ALL
    --------------------
    Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Juan Alberto Limon appeals his 18-month sentence imposed
    following his guilty-plea conviction for transporting an
    undocumented alien within the United States by means of a vehicle
    for private financial gain.   Limon argues that the district court
    erred in increasing his offense level for creating a “substantial
    risk of death or serious bodily injury” by transporting two
    undocumented aliens in the windjammer spoiler of his tractor
    trailer.   Limon acknowledges that he agreed to transport the
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 05-40652
    -2-
    aliens.    However, he asserts that he was not aware of the fact
    that they were hiding in the windjammer spoiler of his tractor
    trailer.
    Following United States v. Booker, 
    543 U.S. 220
    (2005), this
    court continues to review the district court’s application of the
    Guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear error.       See
    United States v. Villegas, 
    404 F.3d 355
    , 359 (5th Cir. 2005);
    United States v. Villanueva, 
    408 F.3d 193
    , 203 & n.9 (5th Cir.),
    cert. denied, 
    126 S. Ct. 268
    (2005).    A factual finding is not
    clearly erroneous as long as it is plausible in light of the
    record as a whole.    United States v. Simpson, 
    334 F.3d 453
    , 455-
    56 (5th Cir. 2003).
    Limon’s argument that the record lacks evidence
    demonstrating his knowledge of the fact that the aliens were
    hiding in the windjammer is unavailing.    The presentence report
    (PSR) reflects that Limon admitted to authorities that he knew
    that the aliens were hiding in the windjammer spoiler of his
    tractor trailer.    Limon never objected to the PSR’s recitation of
    his statement nor denied making the statement to authorities.      He
    has thus failed to show that the information in the PSR
    concerning his own statement “was materially untrue.”     See United
    States v. Angulo, 
    927 F.2d 202
    , 205 (5th Cir. 1991).    As such,
    the district court’s determination that Limon “intentionally or
    recklessly creat[ed] a substantial risk of death or serious
    bodily injury” by transporting the aliens in the windjammer
    No. 05-40652
    -3-
    spoiler of his tractor trailer is plausible in light of the
    record as a whole.   See 
    Simpson, 334 F.3d at 455-56
    .
    Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in applying
    the enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(5).   Limon’s sentence
    is thus AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-40652

Judges: Smith, Garza, Prado

Filed Date: 4/17/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024