O'Neal Mills, Sr. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, McDermott Inc., & Crawford and Company , 856 F.2d 28 ( 1988 )

856 F.2d 28

O'Neal MILLS, Sr., Petitioner
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, McDermott, Inc., &
Crawford and Company, Respondents

No. 87-4464.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 9, 1988.

Lawrence A. Arcell, Barker, Boudreaux, Lamy & Foley, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

1

John Gomila, John J. Weigel, New Orleans, La., for amicus Avondale.

2

Maurice C. Hebert, Jr., Alan G. Brackett, New Orleans, La., for amicus Petroleum.

3

Joseph W. Looney, Marion L. Fagan, New Orleans, La., for McDermott & Crawford.

4

Linda M. Meekins, Clerk, BRB, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for other interested persons.

5

Joshua R. Gillelan, II, Washington, D.C., for Director, OWCP, U.S. Dept. of Labor.

6

James F. Holmes, Paul G. Preston, Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, La., for amicus Brown & Root and Gulf Marine.

7

James E. Doyle, Darrel E. Reed, Jr., E. John Gorman, Houston, Tex., for amicus curiae The American Petroleum Inst., et al.

8

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

9

(Opinion June 13, 1988, 5 Cir., 1988, 846 F.2d 1013)

10

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

11

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

12

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.