United States v. Longbine , 115 F. App'x 221 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 December 16, 2004
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-10438
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    STEFAN DEWAYNE LONGBINE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:03-CR-257-ALL-Y
    --------------------
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Stefan Dewayne Longbine appeals from his conviction of
    receipt of child pornography.    The Government’s motion for
    summary affirmance is GRANTED.    The Government’s motion to
    dismiss the appeal is DENIED.    The Government’s motion for an
    extension of time in which to file a brief is DENIED as moot.
    Longbine contends that the district court erred by applying
    U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2 to determine his offense level and, for the
    first time on appeal, that the four-level adjustment to his
    offense level for having material depicting sadistic and
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-10438
    -2-
    masochistic images of adults having sex with children violated
    Blakely v. Washington, 
    124 S. Ct. 2531
    (2004), and constituted
    plain error.     Longbine concedes that his Blakely contention is
    foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro, 
    377 F.3d 464
    (5th Cir.
    2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004)(No. 04-
    5263), but he raises the issue to preserve it for further review.
    Longbine’s receipt of child pornography was sufficient to
    trigger application of U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2.     United States v.
    Canada, 
    110 F.3d 260
    , 264 (5th Cir. 1997).    Longbine’s argument
    that his guideline adjustment violated Blakely is foreclosed by
    Pineiro, in which this court held that “Blakely does not extend
    to the federal Guidelines.”     
    Pineiro, 377 F.3d at 465-66
    .
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-10438

Citation Numbers: 115 F. App'x 221

Judges: King, Demoss, Clement

Filed Date: 12/16/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024