Eriberto Sotelo-Soto v. Eric Holder, Jr. ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 11-60340     Document: 00511770183         Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/28/2012
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    February 28, 2012
    No. 11-60340
    Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    ERIBERTO SOTELO-SOTO, also known as Eriberto Soto Sotelo,
    Petitioner
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Respondent
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    BIA No. A043 798 420
    Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Eriberto Sotelo-Soto, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissal of his appeal of an order of
    removal based on his prior conviction for evading arrest or detention with a
    motor vehicle under Texas Penal Code § 38.04. See 
    8 U.S.C. § 1227
    (a)(2)(A)(iii).
    Because Sotelo-Soto has raised a question of law for our review, we have
    jurisdiction in this case pursuant to 
    8 U.S.C. § 1227
    (a)(2)(D). See Martinez v.
    Mukasey, 
    519 F.3d 532
    , 538 (5th Cir. 2008) (stating that whether a prior
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 11-60340    Document: 00511770183      Page: 2    Date Filed: 02/28/2012
    No. 11-60340
    conviction is an aggravated felony is a question of law). Sotelo-Soto argues that
    his conviction does not constitute an aggravated felony under Section 1101(a)(43)
    of the Immigration and Nationality Act because the Texas statute applies to
    many non-forceful types of conduct, does not require intent for its violation, and
    does not involve purposeful, violent, and aggressive conduct.
    Section 1101(a)(43) defines “aggravated felony” as including “a crime of
    violence (as defined in section 16 of Title 18, but not including a purely political
    offense) for which the term of imprisonment at least one year.” 
    8 U.S.C. § 1101
    (a)(43)(F) (2006). In United States v. Sanchez-Ledezma, 
    630 F.3d 447
    , 451
    (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    131 S. Ct. 3024
     (2011), this court held that a Texas
    conviction for evading arrest or detention with a motor vehicle under § 38.04
    qualifies as a crime of violence under 
    18 U.S.C. § 16
    (b). Because the offense
    qualifies as a crime of violence and, as he does not dispute, Sotelo-Soto was
    sentenced to a term of two years of imprisonment for the offense, the BIA did not
    err in its conclusions that the offense qualifies as an aggravated felony and that
    Sotelo-Soto is removable as a result. See Sanchez-Ledezma, 
    630 F.3d at 451
    ; 
    8 U.S.C. § 1101
    (a)(43)(F) (defining the term aggravated felony to include a crime
    of violence as defined in § 16(b)); § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). The petition for review is
    therefore DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-60340

Judges: Benavides, Stewart, Higginson

Filed Date: 2/28/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024