Velazquez v. Carswell ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Case: 20-10800     Document: 00516096866          Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/17/2021
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                          United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    November 17, 2021
    No. 20-10800
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Summary Calendar                         Clerk
    Phillip M. Velazquez,
    Plaintiff—Appellant,
    versus
    Brandi Carswell,
    Defendant—Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 5:19-CV-176
    Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Phillip M. Velazquez appeals the dismissal of his civil lawsuit asserting
    that the defendant, Brandi Carswell, was deliberately indifferent to his
    medical needs while he was a pretrial detainee (# 175528) at the Lubbock
    County Detention Center. The district court dismissed the complaint for
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 20-10800        Document: 00516096866        Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/17/2021
    No. 20-10800
    failure to state a claim pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (e)(2)(B)(ii). We review
    the district court’s dismissal de novo. Black v. Warren, 
    134 F.3d 732
    , 734 (5th
    Cir. 1998).
    Velazquez has failed to demonstrate any error in the dismissal of his
    denial-of-medical-care claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 
    556 U.S. 662
    , 678 (2009);
    Bustos v. Martini Club, Inc., 
    599 F.3d 458
    , 461-62 (5th Cir. 2010); see also
    Farmer v. Brennan, 
    511 U.S. 825
    , 837 (1994); Gobert v. Caldwell, 
    463 F.3d 339
    ,
    346 (5th Cir. 2006). He likewise has failed to show that the district court
    abused its discretion in denying his motion to amend his complaint. See
    Marucci Sports, L.L.C. v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 
    751 F.3d 368
    , 378
    (5th Cir. 2014).
    Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    Velazquez’s motion to amend his complaint is DENIED.
    2