United States v. Barrington ( 1995 )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10312
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BENJAMIN BARRINGTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:86-CR-052-D
- - - - - - - - - -
(October 18, 1995)
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Benjamin Barrington has filed
a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief, the points
raised by Barrington in response to that brief, and the record,
and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions
that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.