United States v. Alanis-Gonzales , 115 F. App'x 255 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 December 17, 2004
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-40532
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    SERGIO ALANIS-GONZALES, also known as Juan Antonio
    Robledo-Pesina,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:03-CR-983-ALL
    --------------------
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Sergio Alanis-Gonzales appeals from his conviction of
    illegal reentry following deportation after conviction of an
    aggravated felony.   Alanis contends for the first time on appeal
    that his sentence is constitutionally infirm because
    Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
     (1998), has been
    cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
     (2000),
    and should be overruled.    He also contends that if Almendarez-
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-40532
    -2-
    Torres were overruled, Blakely v. Washington, 
    124 S. Ct. 2531
    (2004), would apply in determining his sentence.    Alanis raises
    these issues only to preserve them for further review, and he
    concedes that this court’s review is under the plain-error
    standard.
    Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See Apprendi,
    
    530 U.S. at 489-90
    ; United States v. Dabeit, 
    231 F.3d 979
    , 984
    (5th Cir. 2000).   We must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and
    until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.”
    Dabeit, 
    231 F.3d at 984
     (internal quotation marks and citation
    omitted).   Further, Blakely does not apply to the federal
    sentencing guidelines.   See United States v. Piniero, 
    377 F.3d 464
    , 473 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14,
    2004)(No. 04-5263).   Alanis has failed to show error, plain or
    otherwise, regarding the applicability of Almendarez-Torres or
    Blakely.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-40532

Citation Numbers: 115 F. App'x 255

Judges: King, Demoss, Clement

Filed Date: 12/17/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024