Ortiz v. Fleming ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                         United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS      August 17, 2004
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-10611
    Conference Calendar
    JEFFREY M. ORTIZ,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    L. E. FLEMING, Warden, Federal Medical Center-Fort Worth,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:03-CV-1442-Y
    --------------------
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Jeffrey M. Ortiz, federal prisoner # 85990-012, appeals from
    the district court’s denial of his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petition.              In
    that petition, Ortiz sought habeas corpus relief on the ground
    that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) violated his constitutional
    rights by informing him he was eligible for early release under
    
    18 U.S.C. § 3621
    (e)(2)(B) and then subsequently determining that
    he was ineligible for early release.   In an appeal from the
    denial of habeas relief, “this Court reviews the district court’s
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-10611
    -2-
    determinations of law de novo and its findings of facts for clear
    error.”    Venegas v. Henman, 
    126 F.3d 760
    , 761 (5th Cir. 1997).
    Ortiz did not have a constitutionally protected right to
    early release under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3621
    (e)(2)(B).    See Rublee v.
    Fleming, 
    160 F.3d 213
    , 216-17 (5th Cir. 1998).    Accordingly, the
    district court properly denied Ortiz’s instant petition.    This
    appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous.     See
    Howard v. King, 
    707 F.2d 215
    , 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).     Because it
    is frivolous, the respondent’s motion to dismiss the instant
    appeal is GRANTED.   All other outstanding motions are DENIED.
    The instant appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.    See 5TH CIR.
    R. 42.2.
    MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; ALL OTHER OUTSTANDING MOTIONS
    DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-10611

Judges: Higginbotham, Davis, Pickering

Filed Date: 8/17/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024