McCray v. Lower ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-20516
    Conference Calendar
    DONALD RAY McCRAY,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    ROBERT LOWER,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. CA-H-95-5710
    - - - - - - - - - -
    August 21, 1996
    Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Donald Ray McCray, # 620694, appeals from the district court’s
    dismissal of his in forma pauperis complaint as frivolous pursuant
    to 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (d), the relevant portion of which has since
    been redesignated as § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) by § 804 of the Prison
    Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 
    110 Stat. 1321
     (1996).
    We have reviewed the record and McCray’s brief and find no abuse of
    discretion.    Because McCray’s complaint lacks an arguable basis in
    *
    Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
    No. 96-20516
    - 2 -
    law, his appeal is frivolous.      See Ancar v. Sara Plasma, Inc., 
    964 F.2d 465
    , 468 (5th Cir. 1992).     Because the appeal is frivolous, it
    is DISMISSED.     5th Cir. R. 42.2.     McCray’s motion for deposition
    testimony is DENIED.
    This court previously cautioned McCray that he risked the
    imposition   of   sanctions   if   he   continued   to   file   meritless
    complaints and cautioned him to review any pending appeals to avoid
    the imposition of sanctions. See McCray v. Stripling, No. 96-10554
    (July 2, 1996); McCray v. Fish, No. 95-10451 (June 5, 1995).
    Accordingly, McCray is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma
    pauperis, civil appeal in this court, or any pro se, in forma
    pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to
    this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission
    of a judge of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the
    clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are directed
    to return to McCray, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent
    with this bar.
    APPEAL DISMISSED. MOTION DENIED. SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-20516

Filed Date: 12/30/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014