McIntyre v. Anthony ( 1995 )


Menu:
  •                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    _____________________
    No. 94-20651
    Summary Calendar
    _____________________
    IN THE MATTER OF: TIGHE ANTHONY and
    NANCY LEE MERELLI,
    Debtors.
    FRANK MCINTYRE,
    Appellant,
    v.
    NANCY LEE MERELLI and TIGHE ANTHONY,
    Appellees.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    (CA H 94 1752)
    _________________________________________________________________
    (April 14, 1995)
    Before KING, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    The   district   court   correctly   dismissed   appellant   Frank
    McIntyre's appeal. The bankruptcy court judgment appealed from was
    entered on October 23, 1992.    Under Bankruptcy Rule 8002, a notice
    *
    Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that
    have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on
    the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless
    expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."
    Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published.
    of appeal must be filed within ten days of the date of entry of the
    judgment.   The ten-day period may be extended once, for a maximum
    of twenty days, upon a showing of excusable neglect.     McIntyre's
    motion for leave to appeal was filed more than five months after
    the entry of judgment by the bankruptcy court.     McIntyre argued
    that he lacked actual notice of the entry of the bankruptcy court's
    judgment.    But, as the district court correctly pointed out,
    McIntyre's lack of notice of the entry of judgment is irrelevant.
    Under Bankruptcy Rule 9022, lack of notice of the entry of a court
    order does not affect the time to appeal or authorize the court to
    relieve a party for failure to file a timely appeal.   We agree with
    the district court that Bankruptcy Rule 9022 should be construed in
    the same manner as Fed. R. Crim. P. 49(b), i.e., it is mandatory
    and precludes out-of-time appeals. See United States v. Awalt, 
    728 F.2d 704
    , 705 (5th Cir. 1984).
    The district court's order dismissing McIntyre's appeal is
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 94-20651

Filed Date: 4/4/1995

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014