Barrera-Garcia v. INS ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 95-60549
    Summary Calendar
    TEODORO BARRERA-GARCIA,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
    SERVICE,
    Respondent.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    (A39 295 979)
    - - - - - - - - - -
    May 17, 1996
    Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Teodoro Barrera-Garcia, a Mexican citizen, petitions for
    review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).
    Barrera argues that the BIA failed to exercise independent
    judgment in reviewing the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) decision and
    abused its discretion by denying Barrera him a waiver of
    deportation pursuant to 
    8 U.S.C. § 1182
    (c), § 212(c) of the
    Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).     The BIA exercised its
    *
    Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
    47.5.4.
    No. 95-60549
    - 2 -
    independent judgment in reviewing the denial of waiver and did
    not abuse its discretion in denying relief from deportation.      See
    Ghassan v. INS, 
    972 F.2d 631
    , 635-36 (5th Cir. 1992); Diaz-
    Resendez v. INS, 
    960 F.2d 493
    , 495 (5th Cir. 1992).
    Barrera also argues that one of the judges sitting on the
    BIA did not exercise impartial judgment because he was a junior
    judge to the immigration judge whose order the BIA was reviewing.
    Barrera presents nothing other than his dissatisfaction with the
    BIA’s decision as evidence of the judge’s bias.   To the extent
    that Barrera is raising new arguments in his reply brief
    concerning due process and C.F.R. violations regarding this
    judicial-bias argument, Barrera is prohibited from raising such
    issues.   See Yohey v. Collins, 
    985 F.2d 222
    , 225 (5th Cir. 1993).
    The petition for review is DENIED.