Davis v. E Baton Rouge Parish ( 2001 )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 01-30168
____________________
CLIFFORD EUGENE DAVIS, JR; NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF
COLORED PEOPLE
Plaintiffs - Appellees
v.
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD,
Etc; ET AL
Defendants
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD,
A Corporation
Defendant - Intervenor Defendant - Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee
____________________
No. 01-30677
____________________
CLIFFORD EUGENE DAVIS, JR; NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF
COLORED PEOPLE
Plaintiffs - Appellees
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD,
Etc; ET AL
Defendants
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD,
A Corporation
Defendant - Appellant
_________________________________________________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana, Baton Rouge
(56-CV-1662-A)
_________________________________________________________________
September 7, 2001
Before, KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The orders that are the subject of these appeals (the Notice
to Counsel entered January 4, 2001, the Ruling on Student
Assignment Plan entered on April 17, 2001 and the Ruling entered on
May 25, 2001) merely interpret the 1996 Consent Decree; they do not
modify it. Martin's Herend Imports, Inc. v. Diamond & Gem Trading
U.S.A. Co., 195 F.3d 765, 769 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, these
orders are not appealable and these appeals are DISMISSED. Any
pending motions are DENIED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2