Amien v. Ashcroft , 78 F. App'x 991 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                         United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS          October 29, 2003
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 02-60798
    Summary Calendar
    MOSES JAMES AMIEN,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Respondent.
    --------------------
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    BIA No. A78 553 396
    --------------------
    Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Moses James Amien requests review of the August 28, 2002,
    decision rendered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).          The
    BIA denied Amien’s motion for reconsideration of its decision
    dismissing his appeal as untimely.      He argues that the 30-day
    appeal period runs from the date that he received the decision of
    the Immigration Judge (IJ) on October 17, 2001, and that his notice
    of appeal was timely filed on November 15, 2001, within 30 days of
    the date he received the decision.       He also argues that the
    application of 
    8 C.F.R. § 1003.38
    (b), the regulation establishing
    the 30-day appeal period, violated his equal protection rights.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-60798
    -2-
    Because Amien did not file a petition for review within 30 days of
    the BIA’s June 4, 2002, order which dismissed Amien’s appeal as
    untimely, we do not have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s June 4,
    2002, order.   See Karimian-Kaklaki v. INS, 
    997 F.2d 108
    , 111 (5th
    Cir. 1993).
    Amien filed a petition for review within 30 days of the BIA’s
    August 28, 2002, order denying his motion for reconsideration and,
    therefore, we have jurisdiction to review that order.           See 
    id.
    Amien has not shown that the BIA abused its discretion in denying
    his motion for reconsideration as untimely.   Amien did not comply
    with the BIA’s instructions to correct the defects in his filing
    within   the   30-day   appeal   period   pursuant   to     
    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2
    (b)(2), and he did not file a motion requesting that the
    BIA accept his untimely motion by certification.          Accordingly,
    Amien’s petition for review is DENIED.
    PETITION DENIED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-60798

Citation Numbers: 78 F. App'x 991

Judges: Barksdale, Garza, Dennis

Filed Date: 10/29/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024